LDK can't just stay neutral and declars war to....

[Hawky]

all you do is flame, are u always this n00bish when having a war? This is way wourse then any BigD vs. the rest thread I ever saw.. or Taine or whatever!!

n000bs

[Shiner]

Originally Posted by Azador

Spawn Again Azador [GOOD] xxxx (xxxxxx) 10 100,188,000
Waterfalls Azador [GOOD] xxxx (xxxx) 10 166,095,500
taxi12 Sync [ONU] xxxx (xxxx) 10 2,472,000
BigBang IronMan [ONU] xxxx (xxxx) 11 356,508,000
ReTaGuArDiA Konamixs [ONU] xxxx (xxxx) 11 277,413,202


Ok as your word is so honorable and you are such a fair player and as in your alliance nobody cheats cause you are all such "clean & fair people", Annatar, I'm sure that you will kick them all 3 right in the second that you read this. Otherwise you and your alliance are nothing more than cheaters and big n00bs by your own definition.

So kick them or **** off idiot

geeez an inactive can't even send a fleet in this game without that a whole alliance needs to cheat to stop him

why is this cheating, they look like war fleets to me...

[Rolando]

Originally Posted by Azador

Spawn Again Azador [GOOD] xxxx (xxxxxx) 10 100,188,000
Waterfalls Azador [GOOD] xxxx (xxxx) 10 166,095,500
taxi12 Sync [ONU] xxxx (xxxx) 10 2,472,000
BigBang IronMan [ONU] xxxx (xxxx) 11 356,508,000
ReTaGuArDiA Konamixs [ONU] xxxx (xxxx) 11 277,413,202


Ok as your word is so honorable and you are such a fair player and as in your alliance nobody cheats cause you are all such "clean & fair people", Annatar, I'm sure that you will kick them all 3 right in the second that you read this. Otherwise you and your alliance are nothing more than cheaters and big n00bs by your own definition.

So kick them or **** off idiot

geeez an inactive can't even send a fleet in this game without that a whole alliance needs to cheat to stop him

Sorry Azado, but.. i dont see the cheat in that fleets. O_O lol we cannot send fleets or....

Ah and I don't agree with annatar, to send a scout isnt cheat or a fighter to impede the invasion in the first turn is the same thing that to take advantage of the "wait 1".

[Rodas]

Originally Posted by Azador

Spawn Again Azador [GOOD] xxxx (xxxxxx) 10 100,188,000
Waterfalls Azador [GOOD] xxxx (xxxx) 10 166,095,500
taxi12 Sync [ONU] xxxx (xxxx) 10 2,472,000
BigBang IronMan [ONU] xxxx (xxxx) 11 356,508,000
ReTaGuArDiA Konamixs [ONU] xxxx (xxxx) 11 277,413,202


Ok as your word is so honorable and you are such a fair player and as in your alliance nobody cheats cause you are all such "clean & fair people", Annatar, I'm sure that you will kick them all 3 right in the second that you read this. Otherwise you and your alliance are nothing more than cheaters and big n00bs by your own definition.

So kick them or **** off idiot

geeez an inactive can't even send a fleet in this game without that a whole alliance needs to cheat to stop him

are u in LDK? are u in ONU?

then why are u posting this here? .. plz, go away

[Azador]

Originally Posted by Rodas

are u in LDK? are u in ONU?

then why are u posting this here? .. plz, go away

I'm posting here cause YOUR leader had nothing better to do than flame 5 pages for a lil scout and now i would like to see that he takes action against the people in his alliance who cheat in the same way as the cheating that Annatar expects LDK members to get banned for. But if you feel like opening a new thread for this than do so. I'll delete the post here and post it again there


@Shiner: I'm not saying it's cheating I said it's cheating by Annatars definition! If it's 1 fighter or some other smaller ships which will die for sure who the hell cares? He obviously only does it to delay the invasion and that's cheating in Annatars definition so I think he should kick them if he expects that LDK members get banned for it!

@Hawky: Go farming and find somebody elses *** to lick than BigDs as he is hopefully not around anymore.

[Annatar]

Originally Posted by Azador

I'm posting here cause YOUR leader had nothing better to do than flame 5 pages for a lil scout and now i would like to see that he takes action against the people in his alliance who cheat in the same way as the cheating that Annatar expects LDK members to get banned for. But if you feel like opening a new thread for this than do so. I'll delete the post here and post it again there


@Shiner: I'm not saying it's cheating I said it's cheating by Annatars definition! If it's 1 fighter or some other smaller ships which will die for sure who the hell cares? He obviously only does it to delay the invasion and that's cheating in Annatars definition so I think he should kick them if he expects that LDK members get banned for it!

@Hawky: Go farming and find somebody elses *** to lick than BigDs as he is hopefully not around anymore.

1. im not the leader of onu
2. you sux
3. send fleet is cheat? if this is cheat ban all DG please
4. you sux
5. dont cry more
6. you sux
7. hmmm i said before that you sux?

[Hawky]

Originally Posted by Azador

@Hawky: Go farming and find somebody elses *** to lick than BigDs as he is hopefully not around anymore.

but but but.. his *** is so tasy

And, you obiusly dont know me, so shut up

And this flame thread is pathetich beyond any meassure.

[Shiner]

Originally Posted by Azador

@Shiner: I'm not saying it's cheating I said it's cheating by Annatars definition! If it's 1 fighter or some other smaller ships which will die for sure who the hell cares? He obviously only does it to delay the invasion and that's cheating in Annatars definition so I think he should kick them if he expects that LDK members get banned for it!

There is quite a difference in sending a single fighter/bomber/whatever then sending a 100milion war fleet.

However, i don't agree with the sending the single fighter, but i do NOT claim it is cheating, and furthermore I haven't seen that it where different rulers, so i apologise

[Annatar]

Originally Posted by Shiner

There is quite a difference in sending a single fighter/bomber/whatever then sending a 100milion war fleet.

However, i don't agree with the sending the single fighter, but i do NOT claim it is cheating, and furthermore I haven't seen that it where different rulers, so i apologise

you are right shiner :PPPPP

[biff2100]

Originally Posted by Hawky

but but but.. his *** is so tasy

And, you obiusly dont know me, so shut up

And this flame thread is pathetich beyond any meassure.

But not as pathetich as your spelling by any meassure.

[biff2100]

Originally Posted by Shiner

There is quite a difference in sending a single fighter/bomber/whatever then sending a 100milion war fleet.

However, i don't agree with the sending the single fighter, but i do NOT claim it is cheating, and furthermore I haven't seen that it where different rulers, so i apologise

It is a 2.5M fleet - it's the small fleet that's blocking the invasion so that the 600M fleets can come in and smash any remaining fleet next tick. It's just the fighter bug on a larger scale.

So when is it not the fighter bug? 2 fighters? 10 fighters? 100 fighters? 1 freighter? 50 frigates? 1 battleship?

See the problem? At this point in the game, sacrificing a 2.5M fleet is not much different than a fighter. It may as well be 1 fighter, it's clearly for the same purpose even if it is slighly more expensive to implement.

[Azador]

lol Annatar you are so pathetic. When LDK does it you want them to be banned but when your alliance mates do it than you talk stupid.

So go away cheater boy and take all your multis and account sharers and fake account creators and bug abuser along (afterall there are/were enough in your alliance)

I really wonder if you have more than hot air in your head but your english skill seems to show that this is not the case

[Shiner]

Originally Posted by biff2100

It is a 2.5M fleet - it's the small fleet that's blocking the invasion so that the 600M fleets can come in and smash any remaining fleet next tick. It's just the fighter bug on a larger scale.

So when is it not the fighter bug? 2 fighters? 10 fighters? 100 fighters? 1 freighter? 50 frigates? 1 battleship?

See the problem? At this point in the game, sacrificing a 2.5M fleet is not much different than a fighter. It may as well be 1 fighter, it's clearly for the same purpose even if it is slighly more expensive to implement.

with this logic, any fleet is the fighter bug

[Rolando]

Originally Posted by biff2100

It is a 2.5M fleet - it's the small fleet that's blocking the invasion so that the 600M fleets can come in and smash any remaining fleet next tick. It's just the fighter bug on a larger scale.

So when is it not the fighter bug? 2 fighters? 10 fighters? 100 fighters? 1 freighter? 50 frigates? 1 battleship?

See the problem? At this point in the game, sacrificing a 2.5M fleet is not much different than a fighter. It may as well be 1 fighter, it's clearly for the same purpose even if it is slighly more expensive to implement.

I don't really find the difference among impeding the invasion in the first turn (only the first turn) and to use the "wait 1" bug. I believe that the use of the wait 1 find his replica in that action... the essence of the fighter bug should not be in the use of a single fleet but if in the use of successive fleets. Now then the size of those fleets is another history. . . . how much should a player sacrifice for not being considered fighter bug? or is it made of trying to retard the invasion it is cheater already, be like the utilized fleets be?..... ufff difficult work that of Dr Kev

[[Cracker]]

just keep in mind that it was Annatar starting the whole discussion by his completely bull**** of whining about LDK sending a SINGLE fighter to delay the invasion. Thats the point Azador is referring to - whats the difference in using a fighter to delay an invasion or sending 10 merchants (in one fleet)? The reason for the sending is in both cases the same - to delay the invasion - there is no other sense in someone sending a fighter or 2 destroyers, a battleship or WHAT EVER fleet he has ready at this moment. Therefore Azador just wanted to point out, that ONU is doing exactly what ONU is labelling as cheating.